H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sue Barker vs Catrin Jexell H2H: 2-0

Sue Barker holds a 2–0 lead over Catrin Jexell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1983 Brighton round of 16 6-1 6-2.

GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Barker 6-1 6-2 Catrin Jexell Match data Oct 21, 1983* R16 Brighton WTA 250 Carpet
Sue Barker 1-6 6-2 7-5 Catrin Jexell Match data Jun 10, 1982* R32 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Barker #162 #5 2,262 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Catrin Jexell 1,737 46 62 42.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Catrin Jexell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% 1,513 0 0
15 1971 1–1 50.0% 1,526 0 0
16 1972 3–2 60.0% 1,542 0 0 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,474 0 0
17 1973 8–6 57.1% 1,569 0 1 1980 6–4 60.0% 1,545 0 0
18 1974 40–20 66.7% 1,764 0 6 1981 6–7 46.2% 1,544 0 0
19 1975 50–19 72.5% 1,969 0 11 1982 14–8 63.6% 1,661 0 1
20 1976 64–23 73.6% #10 2,065 1 14 1983 12–17 41.4% 1,648 0 1
21 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,142 1 16 1984 5–15 25.0% 1,536 0 1
22 1978 16–14 53.3% 1,936 1 17 1985 3–8 27.3% 1,490 0 1
23 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,022 1 20
24 1980 34–18 65.4% 1,930 1 20 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,477 0 1
25 1981 28–18 60.9% 1,958 1 21
26 1982 11–19 36.7% 1,804 1 21
27 1983 18–20 47.4% 1,750 1 22
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,555 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Barker Catrin Jexell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1971 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 5 5 10 50.0%
19 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1985 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0%
24 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
27 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3%
28 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1% 12 14 26 46.2% 25 25 50 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Barker Catrin Jexell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1514 108.5 50.0% +0.50 -0.03
15 1971 1526 105.0 50.0% 0.00 +0.11
16 1972 1542 113.2 +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 +1.44 1979 1474 98.1 20.0% -2.40 0–1 -0.04
17 1973 1569 110.1 -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) +1.95 1980 1545 112.9 +51 57.1% +0.33 1–0 1–1 +0.44
18 1974 1765 135.9 -151 -87 -21 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.79 1981 1545 105.9 +71 46.9% -0.41 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 +1.08
19 1975 1970 154.9 -139 -87 -18 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.41 1982 1661 113.2 -96 +61 -48 60.8% +0.71 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +2.02
20 1976 2065 160.2 -34 -14 -12 68.2% +1.32 17–7 (71%) 6–6 (50%) 110.0 -4.93 1983 1649 120.8 +19 +52 -106 43.8% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.3 +0.89
21 1977 2143 167.0 +151 -94 -79 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.72 1984 1537 103.2 +36 +101 27.9% -1.35 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +1.37
22 1978 1937 142.1 +44 +82 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -1.00 1985 1491 107.6 +104 +58 32.0% -0.96 1–2 (33%) +0.79
23 1979 2022 162.5 +44 -17 +25 66.3% +1.16 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 92.1 -4.06
24 1980 1930 145.7 +28 +103 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 +0.09 1987 1477 97.7 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.16
25 1981 1958 149.2 +21 -1 +64 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.65
26 1982 1804 134.1 +60 +89 +86 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 -3.09
27 1983 1751 132.8 +74 +55 +125 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.35
28 1984 1555 94.1 +107 +140 +248 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) +0.91
Career 2263 155.4 +36 -26 +24 61.8% +0.84 83–65 (56%) 63–37 (63%) 106.4 -3.08 1737 114.4 +17 +67 -67 44.3% -0.39 12–16 (43%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +6.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.