H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sue Barker vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 2-1
Sue Barker holds a 2–1 lead over Claudia Kohde Kilsch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 2–0 on grass, while Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1982 Los Angeles third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1982* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 6-3 7-5 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Dec 5, 1980* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Sue Barker | 7-6 6-2 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
| Nov 28, 1980* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-4 6-3 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 |