H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Barker vs Iva Budarova H2H: 0-1
Iva Budarova holds a 1–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1982 Australian Open second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Iva Budarova | 6-3 6-2 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |