H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Barker vs Kate Latham H2H: 5-2
Sue Barker holds a 5–2 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1983 Manhattan Beach fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1983* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Kate Latham | 6-2 6-4 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1979* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sue Barker | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1979* | Chichester | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-4 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1979* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1979* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-1 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1979* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kate Latham | 6-4 6-4 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1975* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-4 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |