H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Barker vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-1
Sue Barker and Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay, while Sue Barker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1983 Hilton Head second round 6-4 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 1983* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Oct 16, 1980* | Deerfield Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sue Barker | 6-2 6-3 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |