H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sue Barker vs Marcie Louie H2H: 3-0
Sue Barker holds a 3–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1976 Dallas third round 7-6(2) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1976* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1976* | Akron | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-1 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1975* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-1 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |