H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sue Barker vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 1-1
Sue Barker and Marie Pinterova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Marie Pinterova won the 1982 Eastbourne second round 2-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 1982* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Marie Pinterova | 2-6 7-5 6-3 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Dec 13, 1980* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | SF | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-0 6-2 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |