H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sue Barker vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 1-1
Sue Barker and Mary Lou Piatek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1981 Richmond final 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1981* | Richmond | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Mary Lou Piatek | 6-4 6-1 | Sue Barker | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1980* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-0 | Mary Lou Piatek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Mary Lou Piatek | — | — | — | 1,936 | 153 | 206 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sue Barker | Mary Lou Piatek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–12 | 57.1% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1985 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1986 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1987 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 2 |
| 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1988 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1989 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |
| 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1990 | 8–11 | 42.1% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1991 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |