H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sue Barker vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 5-0

Sue Barker holds a 5–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1981 Indianapolis round of 16 6-4 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main-draw meetings
Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Barker 6-4 6-7 6-4 Renata Tomanova Match data Aug 7, 1981* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Sue Barker 6-4 3-6 6-3 Renata Tomanova Match data Nov 25, 1977* R16 Melbourne WTA 250 Grass
Sue Barker 7-6 6-4 Renata Tomanova Match data Jan 14, 1977* R16 Hollywood WTA 250 Carpet
Sue Barker 6-2 0-6 6-2 Renata Tomanova Match data Jun 13, 1976* F Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Sue Barker 6-3 6-1 Renata Tomanova Match data May 23, 1976* F Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Barker #162 #5 — 2,262 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Renata Tomanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
16 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,542 0 0 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
17 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,569 0 1 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
18 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,764 0 6 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0
19 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,969 0 11 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4
20 1976 64–23 73.6% #10 2,065 1 14 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6
21 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,142 1 16 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8
22 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,936 1 17 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9
23 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,022 1 20 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9
24 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,930 1 20 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9
25 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,958 1 21 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9
26 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,804 1 21 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9
27 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,750 1 22 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,555 1 22 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Barker Renata Tomanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1971 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 1972 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3% 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0%
22 1978 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2%
23 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0% 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
24 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1% — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Barker Renata Tomanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1514 108.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1971 1526 105.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.11 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89
16 1972 1542 113.2 — — — — — — +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +1.44 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64
17 1973 1569 110.1 — — — — — -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) — — +1.95 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01
18 1974 1765 135.9 — — — — -151 -87 -21 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.79 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79
19 1975 1970 154.9 — — — — -139 -87 -18 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.41 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40
20 1976 2065 160.2 — — — — -34 -14 -12 68.2% +1.32 17–7 (71%) 6–6 (50%) 110.0 -4.93 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52
21 1977 2143 167.0 — — — — +151 -94 -79 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.72 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73
22 1978 1937 142.1 — — — — +44 — +82 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -1.00 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11
23 1979 2022 162.5 — — — — +44 -17 +25 66.3% +1.16 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 92.1 -4.06 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55
24 1980 1930 145.7 — — — — +28 — +103 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 +0.09 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45
25 1981 1958 149.2 — — — — +21 -1 +64 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.65 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95
26 1982 1804 134.1 — — — — +60 +89 +86 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — -3.09 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40
27 1983 1751 132.8 — — — — +74 +55 +125 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.35 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63
28 1984 1555 94.1 — — — — +107 +140 +248 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.91 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34
Career — 2263 155.4 — — — — +36 -26 +24 61.8% +0.84 83–65 (56%) 63–37 (63%) 106.4 -3.08 — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.