H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sue Barker vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 2-3

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 3–2 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1984 Sydney second round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 21, 1984* Sydney WTA 500 R64 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #32 7-5 6-3 Sue Barker #57 Match data
Aug 15, 1984* Mahwah WTA 250 R64 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #28 6-2 6-2 Sue Barker #57 Match data
May 30, 1984* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Rosalyn Fairbank #32 6-2 6-3 Sue Barker #57 Match data
May 21, 1981* Berlin WTA 500 R32 Clay Sue Barker 6-3 2-6 7-6 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data
Dec 9, 1979* Sydney WTA 500 F Grass Sue Barker 6-0 7-5 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sue Barker #162 #57 — 2,257 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,571 0 1 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,771 0 6 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,967 0 11 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1976 64–23 73.6% — 2,057 1 14 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1977 51–18 73.9% — 2,107 1 16 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,922 1 17 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1979 54–24 69.2% — 2,017 1 20 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,931 1 20 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,959 1 21 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,803 1 21 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,750 1 22 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,556 1 22 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1