H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sue Barker vs Rosie Reyes H2H: 0-1

Rosie Reyes holds a 1–0 lead over Sue Barker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rosie Reyes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rosie Reyes won the 1974 Madrid Open round of 32 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sue Barker
GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Rosie Reyes
FRA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosie Reyes 6-4 4-6 6-3 Sue Barker Match data Oct 10, 1974* R32 Madrid Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Barker #162 #5 — 2,262 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Rosie Reyes — — — 1,651 37 35 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Rosie Reyes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% — 1,513 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1972 3–2 60.0% — 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1973 8–6 57.1% — 1,569 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1974 40–20 66.7% — 1,764 0 6 — — — — — — —
19 1975 50–19 72.5% — 1,969 0 11 — — — — — — —
20 1976 64–23 73.6% #10 2,065 1 14 — — — — — — —
21 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,142 1 16 — — — — — — —
22 1978 16–14 53.3% — 1,936 1 17 — — — — — — —
23 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,022 1 20 — — — — — — —
24 1980 34–18 65.4% — 1,930 1 20 — — — — — — —
25 1981 28–18 60.9% — 1,958 1 21 — — — — — — —
26 1982 11–19 36.7% — 1,804 1 21 — — — — — — —
27 1983 18–20 47.4% — 1,750 1 22 — — — — — — —
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,555 1 22 — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — 1968 21–11 65.6% — 1,644 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1969 5–7 41.7% — 1,602 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1970 1–2 33.3% — 1,588 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1971 0–3 0.0% — 1,561 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1972 2–1 66.7% — 1,585 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 1973 0–1 0.0% — 1,576 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 1974 1–3 25.0% — 1,569 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1975 5–4 55.6% — 1,602 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,599 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Barker Rosie Reyes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1514 108.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1971 1526 105.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1972 1542 113.2 — — — — — — +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 — +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1973 1569 110.1 — — — — — -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) — — +1.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1974 1765 135.9 — — — — -151 -87 -21 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1975 1970 154.9 — — — — -139 -87 -18 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1976 2065 160.2 — — — — -34 -14 -12 68.2% +1.32 17–7 (71%) 6–6 (50%) 110.0 -4.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1977 2143 167.0 — — — — +151 -94 -79 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1978 1937 142.1 — — — — +44 — +82 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1979 2022 162.5 — — — — +44 -17 +25 66.3% +1.16 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 92.1 -4.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1980 1930 145.7 — — — — +28 — +103 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1981 1958 149.2 — — — — +21 -1 +64 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1982 1804 134.1 — — — — +60 +89 +86 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 — -3.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1983 1751 132.8 — — — — +74 +55 +125 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1984 1555 94.1 — — — — +107 +140 +248 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1644 120.7 — — — — -42 -1 — 60.8% +0.73 9–6 (60%) — — +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1603 105.3 — — — — — -35 -40 42.3% -0.50 1–1 — — +0.75
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1589 102.2 — — — — — -34 — 33.3% -1.17 — — — +0.31
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1562 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1586 111.0 — — — — — — — 66.7% +1.17 — — — +0.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1576 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.04
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1570 112.3 — — — — — -71 — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 0–2 — -0.32
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1602 109.2 — — — — — -47 — 52.2% +0.09 3–2 (60%) — — +0.92
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1599 101.8 — — — — — -34 — 36.4% -1.54 1–0 — — +0.03
Career — 2263 155.4 — — — — +36 -26 +24 61.8% +0.84 83–65 (56%) 63–37 (63%) 106.4 -3.08 — 1652 115.3 — — — — -42 -24 -40 49.4% -0.11 15–9 (63%) 0–2 — +3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.