H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Barker vs Sandy Collins H2H: 3-1
Sue Barker holds a 3–1 lead over Sandy Collins in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1984 Eastbourne second round 1-6 6-4 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1984* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sue Barker | 1-6 6-4 11-9 | Sandy Collins | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1983* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sue Barker | 6-2 7-6 | Sandy Collins | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1981* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 4-6 7-5 6-4 | Sandy Collins | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1980* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandy Collins | 7-5 6-0 | Sue Barker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Sandy Collins | — | — | — | 1,823 | 89 | 151 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Sandy Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1979 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1980 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1981 | 25–20 | 55.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1983 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1985 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,407 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,394 | 0 | 0 |