H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sue Barker vs Stephanie Tolleson H2H: 1-1

Sue Barker and Stephanie Tolleson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Tolleson leads 1–0 on grass, while Sue Barker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Tolleson won the 1978 Eastbourne Open round of 64 7-6 6-4.

GBR Age 70 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Tolleson 7-6 6-4 Sue Barker Match data Jun 21, 1978* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Sue Barker 6-3 6-2 Stephanie Tolleson Match data Mar 17, 1977* R32 Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Barker #162 #5 2,262 381 217 63.7% 1 0 0 3 18 22
Stephanie Tolleson 1,566 14 28 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Barker Stephanie Tolleson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% 1,513 0 0
15 1971 1–1 50.0% 1,526 0 0 1971 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
16 1972 3–2 60.0% 1,542 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
17 1973 8–6 57.1% 1,569 0 1 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,490 0 0
18 1974 40–20 66.7% 1,764 0 6 1974 4–2 66.7% 1,542 0 0
19 1975 50–19 72.5% 1,969 0 11 1975 0–2 0.0% 1,512 0 0
20 1976 64–23 73.6% #10 2,065 1 14 1976 6–6 50.0% 1,552 0 0
21 1977 51–18 73.9% #5 2,142 1 16 1977 1–6 14.3% 1,528 0 0
22 1978 16–14 53.3% 1,936 1 17 1978 3–7 30.0% 1,533 0 0
23 1979 54–24 69.2% #10 2,022 1 20 1979 0–2 0.0% 1,521 0 0
24 1980 34–18 65.4% 1,930 1 20
25 1981 28–18 60.9% 1,958 1 21
26 1982 11–19 36.7% 1,804 1 21
27 1983 18–20 47.4% 1,750 1 22
28 1984 2–14 12.5% #57 1,555 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Barker Stephanie Tolleson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1971 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1972 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1973 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 19 9 28 67.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1974 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 18 6 24 75.0% 21 6 27 77.8% 7 4 11 63.6% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 21 11 32 65.6% 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1977 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 14 5 19 73.7% 30 6 36 83.3% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1978 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1979 12 6 18 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 15 10 25 60.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1980 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6%
25 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
26 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
27 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3%
28 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 42 39 81 51.9% 70 36 106 66.0% 133 64 197 67.5% 113 75 188 60.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Barker Stephanie Tolleson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1514 108.5 50.0% +0.50 -0.03
15 1971 1526 105.0 50.0% 0.00 +0.11 1971 1498 101.3 0.0% -3.50 -0.22
16 1972 1542 113.2 +27 63.6% +1.00 0–1 1–0 +1.44 1972 1498 112.4 0.0% -2.50 0–1 -0.29
17 1973 1569 110.1 -23 -31 58.6% +0.65 0–3 (0%) +1.95 1973 1490 99.3 0.0% -3.00 -0.03
18 1974 1765 135.9 -151 -87 -21 63.0% +1.02 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +3.79 1974 1543 105.2 +53 61.5% +0.77 1–0 +0.78
19 1975 1970 154.9 -139 -87 -18 71.3% +1.42 7–4 (64%) 7–1 (88%) 107.6 -2.41 1975 1513 91.3 0.0% -3.75 +0.27
20 1976 2065 160.2 -34 -14 -12 68.2% +1.32 17–7 (71%) 6–6 (50%) 110.0 -4.93 1976 1552 111.5 +69 -34 46.4% +0.21 3–1 (75%) +0.58
21 1977 2143 167.0 +151 -94 -79 72.9% +1.56 10–4 (71%) 11–3 (79%) 108.3 -7.72 1977 1528 111.9 +67 13.3% -2.87 1–0 -0.02
22 1978 1937 142.1 +44 +82 57.6% +0.97 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 90.7 -1.00 1978 1533 107.1 +59 -17 36.4% -1.41 0–2 1–0 +0.42
23 1979 2022 162.5 +44 -17 +25 66.3% +1.16 9–13 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 92.1 -4.06 1979 1521 99.0 33.3% -0.33 0–1 +0.09
24 1980 1930 145.7 +28 +103 63.8% +1.04 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 96.5 +0.09
25 1981 1958 149.2 +21 -1 +64 57.1% +0.36 14–8 (64%) 10–2 (83%) 109.0 -3.65
26 1982 1804 134.1 +60 +89 +86 37.7% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 0–1 -3.09
27 1983 1751 132.8 +74 +55 +125 48.9% -0.30 5–7 (42%) 7–2 (78%) 99.3 +0.35
28 1984 1555 94.1 +107 +140 +248 12.5% -2.37 2–0 0–3 (0%) +0.91
Career 2263 155.4 +36 -26 +24 61.8% +0.84 83–65 (56%) 63–37 (63%) 106.4 -3.08 1566 111.6 +62 -34 -17 35.2% -1.01 5–4 (56%) 1–1 +3.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.