H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sue Barker vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-0
Sue Barker holds a 1–0 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Barker leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1980 Houston fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 1980* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-1 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Barker | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |