H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sue Mappin vs Michelle Tyler H2H: 0-3
Michelle Tyler holds a 3–0 lead over Sue Mappin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michelle Tyler leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Michelle Tyler won the 1978 Chicago third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1978* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Michelle Tyler | 6-2 6-3 | Sue Mappin | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1976* | Aberavon | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Michelle Tyler | 6-1 6-3 | Sue Mappin | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1976* | Bournemouth Indoors | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Michelle Tyler | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Sue Mappin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Mappin | — | — | — | 1,782 | 107 | 96 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michelle Tyler | — | — | — | 1,893 | 93 | 80 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Mappin | Michelle Tyler | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 27–13 | 67.5% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1972 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1973 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1974 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 17–22 | 43.6% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 15–11 | 57.7% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |