H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sue Saliba vs Emilse Raponi Longo H2H: 1-0

Sue Saliba holds a 1–0 lead over Emilse Raponi Longo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sue Saliba leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sue Saliba won the 1980 Indianapolis round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-2.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Saliba 4-6 6-3 6-2 Emilse Raponi Longo Match data Aug 6, 1980* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Saliba 1,767 69 63 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Emilse Raponi Longo 1,593 32 62 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Saliba Emilse Raponi Longo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
17 1975 0–2 0.0% 1,453 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% 1,516 0 0
19 1977 10–10 50.0% 1,564 0 1
20 1978 6–7 46.2% 1,553 0 1 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,531 0 0
21 1979 9–9 50.0% 1,570 0 1 1979 5–6 45.5% 1,569 0 0
22 1980 34–17 66.7% 1,707 0 3 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,559 0 0
23 1981 8–16 33.3% 1,617 0 3
24 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,608 0 3
25 1983 3–7 30.0% 1,572 0 0
26 1984 11–13 45.8% 1,577 0 0
27 1985 6–14 30.0% 1,504 0 0
28 1986 2–7 22.2% 1,471 0 0
29 1987 1–6 14.3% 1,444 0 0
30 1988 0–3 0.0% 1,409 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Saliba Emilse Raponi Longo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1975 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7%
20 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1978 4 1 5 80.0%
21 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1980 3 5 8 37.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 12 6 18 66.7% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
26 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1985 3 6 9 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
30 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 6 11 17 35.3% 22 14 36 61.1% 32 33 65 49.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 20 39 59 33.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Saliba Emilse Raponi Longo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1973 1484 93.6 0.0% -5.00 +0.24
17 1975 1453 94.3 0.0% -2.75 0–1 +0.52
18 1976 1517 103.0 +50 38.5% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.15
19 1977 1565 109.0 +65 -60 51.1% -0.15 3–4 (43%) +2.53
20 1978 1553 104.6 +1 48.3% -0.62 1–2 (33%) +1.36 1978 1531 110.5 +38 54.5% +0.36 1–0 1–0 +0.10
21 1979 1571 105.8 +17 +7 47.6% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 0–2 +2.49 1979 1570 118.7 +79 44.0% -0.12 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.0 +0.65
22 1980 1708 124.6 -165 -31 -2 62.7% +1.09 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 105.6 +2.25 1980 1560 101.2 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.19
23 1981 1617 108.1 -60 +46 +39 41.8% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) +1.84
24 1982 1608 95.0 0.0% -4.50 -0.02
25 1983 1572 126.8 +68 39.1% -0.91 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 -0.45
26 1984 1578 106.1 +16 +21 46.4% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +3.03
27 1985 1505 102.3 +47 -9 39.1% -0.70 0–6 (0%) 0–6 (0%) 89.0 +2.07
28 1986 1472 93.5 -22 23.8% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.29
29 1987 1445 95.9 -32 18.8% -2.63 1–1 1–1 +0.05
30 1988 1409 89.1 14.3% -2.71 0–1 0–1 +0.38
Career 1768 115.2 -109 +4 -3 52.0% +0.09 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 98.6 +8.09 1594 108.1 +27 +22 37.4% -0.97 10–18 (36%) 6–17 (26%) 89.7 +7.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.