H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sue Saliba vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-2

Kate Latham holds a 2–0 lead over Sue Saliba in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 Tokyo Sillook round of 32 6-2 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sue Saliba
AUS Age 68
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 4-6 6-1 Sue Saliba Match data Sep 17, 1981* R32 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Carpet
Kate Latham 6-1 6-2 Sue Saliba Match data Sep 3, 1981* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Saliba — — — 1,767 69 63 52.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Saliba Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1977 10–10 50.0% — 1,564 0 1 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1978 6–7 46.2% — 1,553 0 1 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1979 9–9 50.0% — 1,570 0 1 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1980 34–17 66.7% — 1,707 0 3 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1981 8–16 33.3% — 1,617 0 3 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,608 0 3 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sue Saliba Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1976 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1979 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1980 3 5 8 37.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1981 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 6 11 17 35.3% 22 14 36 61.1% 32 33 65 49.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Saliba Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1976 1517 103.0 — — — — — +50 — 38.5% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1977 1565 109.0 — — — — — +65 -60 51.1% -0.15 3–4 (43%) — — +2.53 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1978 1553 104.6 — — — — — — +1 48.3% -0.62 1–2 (33%) — — +1.36 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1979 1571 105.8 — — — — — +17 +7 47.6% 0.00 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +2.49 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1980 1708 124.6 — — — — -165 -31 -2 62.7% +1.09 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 105.6 +2.25 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1981 1617 108.1 — — — — -60 +46 +39 41.8% -0.89 3–6 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.84 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1982 1608 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1768 115.2 — — — — -109 +4 -3 52.0% +0.09 20–18 (53%) 6–10 (38%) 98.6 +8.09 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.