H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sue Saliba vs Kim Sands H2H: 1-2
Kim Sands holds a 2–1 lead over Sue Saliba in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Sands leads 2–0 on grass, while Sue Saliba leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Sands won the 1981 Eastbourne second round 3-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1981* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Kim Sands | 3-6 7-6 6-2 | Sue Saliba | Match data |
| Aug 20, 1980* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Sue Saliba | 6-1 7-6 | Kim Sands | Match data |
| Dec 25, 1978 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Kim Sands | 6-2 6-0 | Sue Saliba | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sue Saliba | — | — | — | 1,769 | 69 | 63 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kim Sands | — | — | — | 1,714 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sue Saliba | Kim Sands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1976 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1977 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1979 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 34–17 | 66.7% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |