H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sue Tutt vs Lorna Cornell H2H: 2-1

Sue Tutt holds a 2–1 lead over Lorna Cornell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Tutt leads 2–0 on clay, while Lorna Cornell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sue Tutt won the 1969 Bournemouth round of 64 6-4 3-6 6-4.

GBR Age 83
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sue Tutt 6-4 3-6 6-4 Lorna Cornell Match data Apr 30, 1969* R64 Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay
Lorna Cornell 7-5 6-2 Sue Tutt Match data Jul 19, 1968* R16 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Sue Tutt 6-1 6-3 Lorna Cornell Match data Apr 25, 1968* R32 Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sue Tutt 1,525 7 9 43.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lorna Cornell 1,518 6 19 24.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sue Tutt Lorna Cornell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
25 1968 2–4 33.3% 1,466 0 0
26 1969 5–4 55.6% 1,524 0 1
27 1970 0–1 0.0% 1,520 0 1
35 1968 3–7 30.0% 1,474 0 0
36 1969 2–8 20.0% 1,410 0 0
39 1972 1–1 50.0% 1,422 0 0
41 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,409 0 0
42 1975 0–2 0.0% 1,385 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sue Tutt Lorna Cornell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
25 1968 1467 97.8 +38 38.5% -0.69 0–1 +0.39
26 1969 1524 104.2 +2 +25 47.6% -0.57 3–0 (100%) +0.36
27 1970 1521 95.0 0.0% -6.00 -0.21
35 1968 1475 98.6 +60 -25 31.6% -0.63 1–0 -0.04
36 1969 1410 94.4 +74 -12 36.4% -1.18 0–4 (0%) +0.70
39 1972 1422 95.0 50.0% -1.25 +0.04
41 1974 1410 100.0 33.3% 0.00 0–1 +0.25
42 1975 1386 88.1 0.0% -4.50 +0.39
Career 1526 99.7 +20 +25 41.7% -0.92 3–1 (75%) +3.38 1518 92.2 +68 -20 32.7% -1.17 1–5 (17%) +5.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.