H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sung-Hee Park vs Fang Li H2H: 0-1

Fang Li holds a 1–0 lead over Sung-Hee Park in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1994 China Open round of 16 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sung-Hee Park
KOR Age 51 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Fang Li
CHN Age 53 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fang Li #100 6-3 6-4 Sung-Hee Park #167 Match data Feb 18, 1994* R16 China Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sung-Hee Park #599 #57 271 1,626 29 52 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fang Li #488 #36 723 1,707 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sung-Hee Park Fang Li
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 1–5 16.7% #233 1,462 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 7–5 58.3% #101 1,538 0 0 1992 5–8 38.5% #119 1,543 0 0
20 1995 11–11 50.0% #70 1,596 0 0 1993 6–12 33.3% #132 1,529 0 0
21 1996 8–16 33.3% #101 1,555 0 0 1994 13–13 50.0% #67 1,608 0 0
22 1997 1–7 12.5% #111 1,481 0 0 1995 9–8 52.9% #93 1,622 0 0
23 1998 1–5 16.7% #153 1,457 0 0 1996 3–5 37.5% #199 1,591 0 0
24 1999 0–3 0.0% #214 1,432 0 0 1997 2–3 40.0% #69 1,599 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1998 23–24 48.9% #40 1,676 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1999 6–12 33.3% #86 1,585 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #503 1,542 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 0–3 0.0% #488 1,500 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sung-Hee Park Fang Li
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1993 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1995 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1996 6 12 18 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 12 24 50.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 21 37 58 36.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — 46 55 101 45.5% 17 21 38 44.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 3 7 10 30.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sung-Hee Park Fang Li
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1993 1463 95.2 — — — — +29 — — 28.6% -1.93 0–2 0–2 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1538 113.7 — — — — +30 — — 55.2% +0.17 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 +1.07 1992 1544 119.3 — — — — +55 — — 39.3% -0.68 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
20 1995 1597 123.2 — — — — +16 — -9 52.1% -0.25 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +1.08 1993 1529 112.6 — — — — +30 +31 — 33.3% -1.36 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.54
21 1996 1555 114.5 — — — — +5 — +59 35.2% -1.04 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) 102.2 +0.91 1994 1609 120.8 — — — — -10 +8 — 49.2% -0.22 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 +0.90
22 1997 1481 95.1 — — — — +27 — — 18.8% -2.13 1–1 — — +0.43 1995 1623 122.6 — — — — -4 — — 55.3% +0.32 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +0.34
23 1998 1457 99.2 — — — — +20 — — 21.4% -2.29 1–1 1–0 — +0.39 1996 1592 112.9 — — — — +22 — — 38.1% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.31
24 1999 1432 103.9 — — — — +23 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — +0.10 1997 1600 118.4 — — — — +20 — — 45.5% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.54
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1676 134.1 — — — — +38 -58 — 49.0% -0.06 6–4 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 107.9 +1.15
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1586 117.9 — — — — +101 -16 — 37.8% -0.59 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.9 -0.13
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1542 89.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.39
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1500 92.6 — — — — +80 — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — 0.00
Career — 1627 114.1 — — — — +18 — +20 39.0% -0.98 13–13 (50%) 7–6 (54%) 104.4 +5.25 — 1707 127.8 — — — — +28 -30 — 44.1% -0.42 22–21 (51%) 14–15 (48%) 100.5 +1.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.