H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sung-Hee Park vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-2
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 2–1 lead over Sung-Hee Park in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sung-Hee Park won the 1996 Canadian Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1996* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sung-Hee Park | 6-4 6-2 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 7-5 7-6 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 7-5 6-3 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sung-Hee Park | #599 | #57 | 271 | 1,626 | 29 | 51 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sung-Hee Park | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #233 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #111 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |