H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sung-Hee Park vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-2
Nana Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Sung-Hee Park in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nana Smith leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1996 Surabaya fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1996* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nana Smith | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1994* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nana Smith | 7-5 6-1 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sung-Hee Park | #599 | #57 | 271 | 1,626 | 29 | 51 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sung-Hee Park | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #233 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #111 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |