H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Susan Mascarin vs Barbara Gerken H2H: 3-1
Susan Mascarin holds a 3–1 lead over Barbara Gerken in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Susan Mascarin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Susan Mascarin won the 1986 Los Angeles second round 7-6 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Age 62
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1986* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Susan Mascarin | 7-6 3-6 6-1 | Barbara Gerken | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Susan Mascarin | 6-2 6-0 | Barbara Gerken | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1985* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Barbara Gerken | 6-3 7-6 | Susan Mascarin | Match data |
| Mar 28, 1985* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Susan Mascarin | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Barbara Gerken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Mascarin | #460 | #32 | 14 | 1,796 | 113 | 142 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Barbara Gerken | — | — | — | 1,650 | 64 | 97 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Mascarin | Barbara Gerken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–24 | 27.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #69 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #221 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |