H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Susan Mascarin vs Hu Na H2H: 0-1
Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Mascarin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1986 Phoenix fourth round 3-6 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1986* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Hu Na | 3-6 7-6 7-6 | Susan Mascarin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Mascarin | #460 | #32 | 14 | 1,796 | 113 | 142 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Mascarin | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–24 | 27.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #69 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #221 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |