H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Susan Mascarin vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Mascarin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1986 Los Angeles round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Susan Mascarin
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #38 6-1 6-3 Susan Mascarin #49 Match data Aug 14, 1986* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Mascarin #460 #32 14 1,797 113 142 44.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Mascarin Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 2–1 66.7% — 1,526 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1980 8–9 47.1% — 1,630 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1981 19–22 46.3% — 1,691 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1982 19–18 51.4% — 1,752 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1983 9–24 27.3% — 1,550 0 1 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1984 9–13 40.9% #69 1,649 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1985 22–22 50.0% #65 1,731 0 1 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1986 16–16 50.0% #54 1,691 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1987 6–9 40.0% #118 1,636 0 1 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1988 3–8 27.3% #221 1,551 0 1 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Susan Mascarin Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 6 4 10 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1981 9 6 15 60.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 4 2 6 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1985 4 8 12 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 45 51 96 46.9% 38 44 82 46.3% 10 17 27 37.0% 17 27 44 38.6% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Mascarin Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1979 1527 102.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1980 1630 140.4 — — — — +49 — — 53.8% +0.36 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.1 -0.70 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1981 1691 128.7 — — — — +12 -93 -107 46.3% -0.33 7–6 (54%) 2–6 (25%) 100.1 -0.23 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1982 1753 128.9 — — — — -11 -73 -151 47.0% -0.29 8–3 (73%) 1–2 (33%) 105.0 -2.42 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1983 1551 112.4 — — — — +48 +98 — 30.0% -1.33 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 94.1 0.00 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1984 1649 128.1 — — — — +14 +25 -118 45.8% -0.06 2–4 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 100.4 -0.56 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 1985 1731 133.2 — — — — -76 -10 -111 51.5% -0.04 4–7 (36%) 8–6 (57%) 99.9 -2.27 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1986 1692 126.4 — — — — -32 +32 -82 54.1% +0.09 2–8 (20%) 5–4 (56%) 94.1 -0.91 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1987 1637 112.3 — — — — +11 +15 — 41.2% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 2–0 — +0.92 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1988 1552 110.0 — — — — +21 — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–4 (20%) — +0.98 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1797 132.1 — — — — +1 -3 -121 45.9% -0.33 27–44 (38%) 27–27 (50%) 96.7 -1.95 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.