H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Susan Mascarin vs Pilar Vasquez H2H: 1-2
Pilar Vasquez holds a 2–1 lead over Susan Mascarin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pilar Vasquez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pilar Vasquez won the 1983 Lugano second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 63
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1983* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pilar Vasquez | 6-2 6-0 | Susan Mascarin | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1983* | Pittsburgh | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pilar Vasquez | 6-4 6-1 | Susan Mascarin | Match data |
| May 7, 1981* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Susan Mascarin | 6-3 6-2 | Pilar Vasquez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Mascarin | #460 | #32 | 14 | 1,796 | 113 | 142 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pilar Vasquez | #772 | #66 | 8 | 1,786 | 96 | 133 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Susan Mascarin | Pilar Vasquez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1979 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1980 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1981 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 17–3 | 85.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1982 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–24 | 27.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1984 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #69 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1985 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #116 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #116 | 1,438 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1987 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #149 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #221 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #151 | 1,482 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,510 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #194 | 1,497 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,473 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #306 | 1,408 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,420 | 0 | 4 |