H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Susan Rimes vs Amy Holton H2H: 0-1

Amy Holton holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Rimes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amy Holton leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amy Holton won the 1983 Pittsburgh round of 16 6-4 2-6 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Holton 6-4 2-6 6-1 Susan Rimes Match data Mar 11, 1983* R16 Pittsburgh WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Susan Rimes 1,518 9 24 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amy Holton #300 #162 3 1,578 27 62 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Susan Rimes Amy Holton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0
17 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,475 0 0
18 1983 10–17 37.0% 1,507 0 0
19 1984 6–13 31.6% 1,493 0 0
20 1985 9–16 36.0% 1,553 0 0
21 1980 1–2 33.3% 1,497 0 0 1986 2–13 13.3% #179 1,464 0 0
22 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,469 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #300 1,456 0 0
23 1982 1–4 20.0% 1,457 0 0
24 1983 1–4 20.0% 1,447 0 0
26 1985 4–6 40.0% 1,435 0 0
27 1986 1–3 25.0% 1,427 0 0
28 1987 1–3 25.0% 1,425 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Susan Rimes Amy Holton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1484 98.2 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.11
17 1982 1476 99.5 33.3% -2.00 0–1 +0.04
18 1983 1508 107.0 +12 +99 39.3% -0.93 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 102.8 +1.83
19 1984 1493 112.4 -10 +69 36.4% -0.70 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +1.44
20 1985 1554 108.9 -21 -25 37.7% -1.28 6–5 (55%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 +0.27
21 1980 1497 104.2 33.3% -1.50 -0.35 1986 1465 93.6 +10 +9 15.6% -2.63 1–1 0–2 +0.33
22 1981 1469 97.3 0.0% -2.75 -0.06 1987 1457 99.2 0.0% -3.00 -0.09
23 1982 1457 102.2 +140 25.0% -2.25 1–1 1–0 +0.07
24 1983 1448 104.5 +110 30.8% -1.46 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.38
26 1985 1436 100.1 46.2% -0.35 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) +0.51
27 1986 1427 98.2 +65 33.3% -0.89 0–1 +0.33
28 1987 1426 105.7 33.3% -1.11 0–1 1–0 +0.23
Career 1519 103.4 +65 +125 34.2% -1.18 4–9 (31%) 4–2 (67%) 96.3 +3.36 1579 106.8 -4 +38 34.0% -1.29 14–16 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +4.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.