H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 4–1 lead over Linda Ferrando in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1990 Indianapolis round of 32 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Sloane Lundy | 7-6 6-1 | Linda Ferrando | Match data | Nov 8, 1990* | R32 | Indianapolis | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | 1-6 7-6 6-3 | Linda Ferrando | Match data | Jun 27, 1990* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | 7-5 7-6 | Linda Ferrando | Match data | Feb 15, 1990* | R32 | Chicago | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Carpet |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-3 6-2 | Linda Ferrando | Match data | May 26, 1989* | R16 | Strasbourg Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
| Linda Ferrando | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data | Apr 21, 1989* | R16 | Tampa | WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,882 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Linda Ferrando | #474 | #36 | 42 | 1,734 | 87 | 101 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Susan Sloane Lundy | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #154 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #44 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #67 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Susan Sloane Lundy | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1989 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1989 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1990 | 16 | 9 | 25 | 64.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1991 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 1992 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 66 | 62 | 128 | 51.6% | 21 | 22 | 43 | 48.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | Career | 33 | 37 | 70 | 47.1% | 48 | 47 | 95 | 50.5% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Susan Sloane Lundy | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1985 | 1485 | 95.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.22 | 1985 | 1502 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +63 | — | 50.0% | -0.50 | — | — | — | +0.57 |
| 1986 | 1596 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -38 | — | 43.5% | -0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 99.3 | -0.48 | 1987 | 1537 | 114.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | 41.2% | -0.59 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | -0.36 |
| 1987 | 1636 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -71 | — | 39.3% | -0.80 | 6–2 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | 105.9 | -1.68 | 1988 | 1554 | 116.4 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +13 | — | 50.9% | -0.13 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.1 | +1.49 |
| 1988 | 1846 | 136.9 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -203 | — | 53.0% | +0.20 | 11–2 (85%) | 3–1 (75%) | 113.8 | -0.25 | 1989 | 1687 | 142.3 | — | — | — | — | -24 | +1 | — | 49.3% | +0.27 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.6 | -1.31 |
| 1989 | 1755 | 137.6 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -18 | — | 57.9% | +0.67 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–5 (38%) | 94.8 | -0.26 | 1990 | 1652 | 129.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | +38 | — | 47.9% | +0.03 | 6–7 (46%) | 5–5 (50%) | 96.5 | +0.69 |
| 1990 | 1782 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -73 | — | 56.5% | +0.31 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–5 (44%) | 99.8 | -0.62 | 1991 | 1655 | 121.2 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +44 | -94 | 42.6% | -0.45 | 5–2 (71%) | 0–2 | — | -1.11 |
| 1991 | 1653 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -8 | — | 46.3% | -0.46 | 1–5 (17%) | — | — | +0.61 | 1992 | 1673 | 130.3 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +87 | — | 48.0% | +0.32 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.73 |
| 1992 | 1580 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.63 | — | — | — | -0.33 | 1993 | 1669 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | -85 | +93 | — | 50.8% | +0.06 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.9 | +0.05 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1641 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +33 | — | 38.6% | -0.70 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | -1.03 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1623 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -3.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 1882 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -67 | — | 49.0% | -0.10 | 27–19 (59%) | 13–16 (45%) | 103.8 | -1.48 | Career | 1734 | 134.4 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +47 | -94 | 47.1% | -0.10 | 32–29 (52%) | 11–19 (37%) | 96.1 | -0.86 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 2 | 3 | 5 | Feb 20, 1992 | H2H |
| Linda Ferrando | 4 | 1 | 5 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Camille Benjamin | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 14, 1989 | H2H |
| Beverly Bowes | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Patty Fendick | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jun 29, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Leila Meskhi | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jan 14, 1994 | H2H |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | 1 | 4 | 5 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 4 | 4 | Aug 31, 1994 | H2H |
| Cecilia Dahlman | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 23, 1991 | H2H |