H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Susan Sloane Lundy vs Linda Ferrando H2H: 4-1
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 4–1 lead over Linda Ferrando in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1990 Indianapolis third round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 7-6 6-1 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Susan Sloane Lundy | 1-6 7-6 6-3 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1990* | Chicago | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Susan Sloane Lundy | 7-5 7-6 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| May 26, 1989* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-3 6-2 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1989* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Linda Ferrando | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Linda Ferrando | #474 | #36 | 42 | 1,734 | 87 | 101 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Susan Sloane Lundy | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #154 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #67 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #44 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #67 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |