H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Susan Sloane Lundy vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 2-1
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 2–1 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1990 Indianapolis fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1990* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-4 6-2 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Mareen Louie Harper | 2-6 6-2 6-0 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
| Jan 6, 1986 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Susan Sloane Lundy | 7-5 6-2 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Susan Sloane Lundy | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |