H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Svetlana Cherneva vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-0
Svetlana Cherneva holds a 1–0 lead over Mary Joe Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Svetlana Cherneva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Svetlana Cherneva won the 1986 Eastbourne third round 6-4 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Svetlana Cherneva | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Mary Joe Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svetlana Cherneva | — | — | — | 1,644 | 30 | 44 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Svetlana Cherneva | Mary Joe Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 |