H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-0

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 1–0 lead over Kimiko Date Krumm in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2010 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #13 6-2 4-6 6-1 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 — — — — — — —
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 — — — — — — —
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 — — — — — — —
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 — — — — — — —
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 — — — — — — —
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8