H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 2-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 2–1 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2016 Auckland fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 8, 2016* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Tamira Paszek 6-2 6-3 Svetlana Kuznetsova #25 Match data
Mar 25, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #8 2-6 7-5 6-1 Tamira Paszek Match data
Jul 3, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Svetlana Kuznetsova #5 6-3 6-2 Tamira Paszek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Tamira Paszek — — — 1,801 99 128 43.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,598 0 1
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,641 0 2
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,664 0 2
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 2012 18–20 47.4% — 1,687 0 3
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,483 0 3
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,475 0 3
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,447 0 3
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 2016 6–9 40.0% — 1,498 0 3
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 — — — — — — —
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 — — — — — — —
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 — — — — — — —
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 — — — — — — —
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 — — — — — — —
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 — — — — — — —
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 — — — — — — —
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 — — — — — — —
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 — — — — — — —
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 — — — — — — —
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 — — — — — — —