H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Svetlana Kuznetsova vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 2-1

Svetlana Kuznetsova holds a 2–1 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Svetlana Kuznetsova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Svetlana Kuznetsova won the 2003 Miami first round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Svetlana Kuznetsova
RUS Age 41 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Svetlana Kuznetsova #37 6-3 6-2 Virginia Ruano Pascual #41 Match data
Jul 24, 2002* Sopot WTA 250 R32 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #77 6-2 6-7(7) 6-1 Svetlana Kuznetsova #128 Match data
May 24, 2001* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Svetlana Kuznetsova 4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Svetlana Kuznetsova #1,203 #2 6,191 2,097 580 319 64.5% 2 2 0 10 4 18
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Svetlana Kuznetsova Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 2–2 50.0% #266 1,519 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 2002 22–9 71.0% #43 1,744 0 2 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2003 22–16 57.9% #35 1,819 0 2 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2004 54–19 74.0% #5 2,026 1 5 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2005 29–17 63.0% #18 1,868 1 5 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2006 61–20 75.3% #4 2,039 1 8 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2007 51–20 71.8% #2 1,994 1 9 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2008 41–20 67.2% #8 1,934 1 9 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2009 41–16 71.9% #3 1,981 2 12 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2010 26–16 61.9% #27 1,884 2 13 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2011 31–19 62.0% #19 1,804 2 13 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2012 13–12 52.0% #71 1,776 2 13 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2013 29–18 61.7% #21 1,827 2 13 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2014 27–18 60.0% #27 1,845 2 14 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2015 26–19 57.8% #25 1,836 2 15 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2016 40–20 66.7% #9 1,917 2 17 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2017 32–17 65.3% #12 1,826 2 17 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2018 6–12 33.3% #106 1,709 2 18 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2019 14–13 51.9% #53 1,772 2 18 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2020 8–7 53.3% #36 1,799 2 18 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2021 5–9 35.7% #109 1,726 2 18 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3