H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 1-1
Sybille Bammer and Elena Likhovtseva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2007 Portoroz fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2007* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 6-3 6-2 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2004* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-3 6-1 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Elena Likhovtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |