H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Martina Hingis H2H: 0-1
Martina Hingis holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martina Hingis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martina Hingis won the 2006 Indian Wells third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 45
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Martina Hingis | 6-0 6-3 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Martina Hingis | #19 | #1 | 6,976 | 2,385 | 515 | 126 | 80.3% | 5 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 43 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Martina Hingis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #87 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,160 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,321 | 3 | 14 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 60–12 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 4 | 19 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 70–12 | 85.4% | #1 | 2,285 | 5 | 26 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 78–10 | 88.6% | #1 | 2,314 | 5 | 35 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 5 | 38 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 34–10 | 77.3% | #10 | 2,050 | 5 | 40 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 2,020 | 5 | 40 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 53–19 | 73.6% | #7 | 2,013 | 5 | 42 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,855 | 5 | 43 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |