H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-1

Mary Pierce holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Pierce leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2006 San Diego round of 32 6-1 6-7(7) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Pierce #9 6-1 6-7(7) 7-6(4) Sybille Bammer #46 Match data Aug 3, 2006* R32 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,145 465 218 68.1% 2 5 0 5 6 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,785 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1992 32–10 76.2% #13 1,900 0 4
18 — — — — — — — 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 — — — — — — — 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,055 0 5
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,007 1 7
21 — — — — — — — 1996 18–12 60.0% #24 1,881 1 7
22 — — — — — — — 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,066 1 8
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,124 1 12
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,032 2 15
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,838 2 15
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,751 2 15
28 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2 2004 25–17 59.5% #29 1,785 2 16
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,128 2 18
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,974 2 18

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Bammer Mary Pierce
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 12 6 18 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 2 11 81.8% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 12 4 16 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 19 6 25 76.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 15 5 20 75.0% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — 12 5 17 70.6%
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 25 6 31 80.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 14 6 20 70.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 14 6 20 70.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 1 15 93.3%
24 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 24 10 34 70.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 13 6 19 68.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2003 14 10 24 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2005 19 5 24 79.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
31 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
Career — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — — 207 99 306 67.6% 157 72 229 68.6% 27 13 40 67.5% 74 34 108 68.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's and 60/152 of Mary Pierce's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sybille Bammer Mary Pierce
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0% 2003 9/40 3.9 1.9 64.5% 68.8% 54.0% 63.9% 46.3% 63.3% 44.5%
29 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1% 2004 7/42 1.6 2.1 67.0% 71.4% 54.8% 59.0% 37.4% 66.4% 41.8%
30 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5% 2005 28/53 3.1 1.5 68.1% 68.9% 54.4% 59.1% 48.4% 64.3% 46.0%
31 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0% 2006 16/17 3.5 1.4 67.3% 69.2% 47.5% 52.5% 42.1% 62.2% 42.2%
Career — 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4% — 60/683 3.1 1.6 67.2% 69.2% 52.6% 58.1% 45.1% 63.9% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Bammer Mary Pierce
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1480 106.2 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — -0.34
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1544 134.3 — — — — +3 +35 — 48.3% +0.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.17
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1786 146.7 — — — — -38 -56 — 66.7% +1.33 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 108.5 +1.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1900 149.4 — — — — -37 -50 — 75.3% +2.01 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 100.2 +3.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 2003 165.9 — — — — -4 -109 — 70.4% +1.83 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) 98.2 +1.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2055 169.7 — — — — -25 -54 — 70.9% +1.86 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 100.7 +0.50
20 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 1995 2008 168.6 — — — — +34 -13 — 72.1% +1.78 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 +1.10
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1881 134.2 — — — — +65 +72 -205 58.3% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +2.43
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2066 169.1 — — — — -62 +83 -301 68.5% +1.35 12–4 (75%) 6–3 (67%) 108.2 -4.07
23 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17 1998 2124 173.3 — — — — +36 -4 — 66.0% +1.50 12–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 110.4 -2.64
24 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03 1999 2053 167.4 — — — — +28 +14 -309 67.8% +1.34 10–7 (59%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +1.22
25 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20 2000 2033 163.9 — — — — -27 +116 — 72.3% +2.00 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.29
26 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24 2001 1839 112.0 — — — — +44 +254 — 48.4% -0.13 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +1.21
27 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23 2002 1752 124.6 — — — — +10 +260 +15 55.0% +0.35 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 92.5 -0.57
28 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02 2003 1787 140.5 +4.39 +0.45 1.214 53.8% -23 +157 +58 58.1% +0.66 6–4 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 98.2 -0.38
29 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49 2004 1785 145.7 +5.15 -0.28 1.246 53.7% -31 +86 +122 59.6% +1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.9 -1.86
30 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29 2005 2128 166.4 +7.54 +2.70 1.291 54.8% -48 -147 -186 71.7% +1.54 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 108.3 -3.66
31 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29 2006 1975 136.3 +4.44 -0.56 1.116 52.0% -39 — — 55.9% +0.27 1–1 5–3 (63%) — -0.83
Career — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83 — 2145 166.5 +5.96 +1.15 1.225 53.8% -10 +27 -119 66.1% +1.33 90–58 (61%) 69–58 (54%) 101.5 -0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.