H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 4-1

Sybille Bammer holds a 4–1 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2009 Roland Garros first round 6-3 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sybille Bammer #29 6-3 7-6(1) Nathalie Dechy #65 Match data May 26, 2009* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Sybille Bammer #53 6-3 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #42 Match data Oct 13, 2006* R16 Bangkok Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nathalie Dechy #36 6-1 3-6 6-3 Sybille Bammer #55 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Luxembourg Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sybille Bammer #48 5-7 6-3 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #32 Match data Aug 30, 2006* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Sybille Bammer #47 7-5 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #23 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,918 293 272 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,606 0 0
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,788 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 30–20 60.0% #26 1,792 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,629 0 0
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,840 0 1
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0 2004 33–24 57.9% #21 1,809 0 1
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,797 0 1
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,648 0 1
28 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,580 0 1
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Bammer Nathalie Dechy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 7 20 65.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 8 15 23 34.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — — 160 145 305 52.5% 71 66 137 51.8% 34 33 67 50.7% 28 28 56 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's and 132/292 of Nathalie Dechy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sybille Bammer Nathalie Dechy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/49 1.7 4.9 64.0% 63.0% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 58.4% 50.8%
25 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3% 2004 8/57 1.9 3.4 68.4% 60.9% 50.1% 65.8% 62.3% 56.9% 44.5%
26 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8% 2005 18/66 1.4 3.2 69.7% 61.9% 48.5% 60.7% 55.8% 57.5% 44.6%
27 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2% 2006 31/41 1.6 2.8 72.6% 60.3% 44.3% 54.0% 44.4% 55.9% 42.0%
28 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0% 2007 27/35 1.1 3.0 72.8% 56.7% 43.7% 46.8% 46.2% 53.3% 42.4%
29 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1% 2008 26/29 1.7 4.7 64.9% 59.5% 41.5% 48.8% 54.7% 53.0% 43.2%
30 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5% 2009 15/15 1.3 3.5 68.6% 58.7% 41.0% 48.6% 48.4% 53.2% 39.3%
31 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4% — 132/565 1.5 3.5 69.6% 59.6% 44.5% 52.1% 49.9% 54.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Bammer Nathalie Dechy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1481 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1501 112.9 — — — — +19 +53 — 38.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.56
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1540 124.8 — — — — -7 +9 — 42.9% -0.29 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.35
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1607 125.9 — — — — -40 -52 +18 42.2% -0.42 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.60
20 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 1999 1788 147.7 — — — — -63 -117 -80 55.1% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 108.9 -1.15
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1792 145.6 — — — — -2 -103 -48 58.7% +0.61 9–6 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 101.9 -1.62
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1629 124.7 — — — — +13 +69 +76 48.6% -0.06 7–12 (37%) 5–5 (50%) 93.7 -0.20
23 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17 2002 1770 144.3 — — — — -37 +23 -68 56.2% +0.35 14–11 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 105.9 -0.89
24 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03 2003 1840 138.9 +1.35 +3.00 1.221 54.2% -60 +48 -96 58.5% +0.48 12–2 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 108.2 -0.85
25 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20 2004 1810 147.7 +1.35 +0.63 1.034 51.1% +6 +3 -86 57.9% +0.62 7–9 (44%) 6–8 (43%) 95.0 -1.40
26 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24 2005 1798 146.1 +1.56 +0.35 1.048 51.3% +22 -36 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–6 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 98.9 +1.39
27 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23 2006 1648 128.2 +0.04 -1.40 0.952 49.0% -1 +72 +148 42.7% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 92.6 +0.62
28 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02 2007 1651 130.6 -1.46 -0.89 0.907 47.9% -3 +66 +97 45.6% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–8 (33%) 95.8 -1.91
29 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49 2008 1671 130.8 -1.57 -0.33 0.919 48.2% +12 -28 +59 45.5% -0.24 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -1.85
30 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29 2009 1581 108.4 -1.61 -3.48 0.839 46.8% +48 +1 +106 32.4% -1.11 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 -0.41
31 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83 — 1919 143.2 -0.42 -0.73 0.953 49.1% -9 0 -6 51.4% +0.13 98–90 (52%) 60–67 (47%) 96.4 -1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.