H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 2-0

Sybille Bammer holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2006 Bangkok round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sybille Bammer #53 6-1 6-3 Nicole Pratt #77 Match data Oct 12, 2006* R32 Bangkok Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Sybille Bammer #95 6-1 6-3 Nicole Pratt #129 Match data Sep 22, 2005* R32 Kolkata Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Bammer Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's and 48/157 of Nicole Pratt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sybille Bammer Nicole Pratt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5% 2003 5/40 0.2 4.4 66.1% 58.7% 43.7% 50.3% 59.6% 53.4% 44.9%
31 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0% 2004 6/43 0.2 4.2 65.0% 59.4% 44.8% 55.7% 43.2% 54.1% 41.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/25 0.8 5.2 59.5% 65.7% 44.6% 56.6% 40.1% 57.3% 44.7%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 8/20 0.5 2.1 70.5% 55.5% 41.2% 46.6% 36.4% 51.0% 39.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/26 1.0 2.3 68.4% 57.3% 43.1% 36.6% 53.8% 53.1% 41.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 3/3 0.0 2.7 71.0% 48.8% 32.7% 31.1% 30.0% 44.7% 35.8%
Career — 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4% — 48/378 0.6 3.1 67.3% 57.8% 42.6% 43.8% 47.3% 52.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Bammer Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.