H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-1
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2006 Stanford fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2006* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-1 6-4 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |