H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 0-1
Nuria Llagostera Vives holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nuria Llagostera Vives leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nuria Llagostera Vives won the 2005 Guangzhou third round 6-2 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 46
Right-Handed
156 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005* | Guangzhou | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nuria Llagostera Vives | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Sybille Bammer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nuria Llagostera Vives | #775 | #35 | 968 | 1,685 | 77 | 110 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Nuria Llagostera Vives | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #128 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #103 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #192 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #50 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #275 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #68 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #127 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,548 | 0 | 2 |