H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Stéphanie Dubois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2008 Los Angeles round of 32 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | 6-3 7-5 | Stéphanie Dubois | Match data | Jul 24, 2008* | R32 | Los Angeles | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,846 | 133 | 140 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stéphanie Dubois | #352 | #87 | 757 | 1,569 | 23 | 61 | 27.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #133 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #105 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #156 | 1,419 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #140 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,379 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #26 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2004 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2005 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2006 | 14 | 20 | 34 | 41.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2013 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 29 | 16 | 45 | 64.4% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2014 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 22 | 18 | 40 | 55.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 94 | 97 | 191 | 49.2% | 30 | 32 | 62 | 48.4% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | — | 19 | 41 | 60 | 31.7% | 2 | 11 | 13 | 15.4% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's and 64/78 of Stéphanie Dubois's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3/6 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 63.3% | 53.4% | 50.7% | 38.6% | 83.3% | 52.4% | 35.0% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3/6 | 1.7 | 3.3 | 66.0% | 57.4% | 40.6% | 36.5% | 42.2% | 51.9% | 45.8% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 19/22 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 65.8% | 60.3% | 43.0% | 43.0% | 44.6% | 54.0% | 41.7% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 10/11 | 0.5 | 4.2 | 61.2% | 58.1% | 32.1% | 43.6% | 44.6% | 48.3% | 36.9% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6/7 | 0.8 | 3.3 | 70.4% | 56.4% | 42.1% | 53.0% | 56.4% | 52.2% | 38.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7/8 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 56.0% | 58.9% | 41.8% | 49.3% | 38.6% | 50.8% | 45.1% |
| 25 | 2005 | 1/12 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 56.3% | 52.4% | 44.9% | 46.2% | 35.3% | 49.1% | 46.3% | 2012 | 11/12 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 68.0% | 55.0% | 43.3% | 52.9% | 44.9% | 51.6% | 42.0% |
| 26 | 2006 | 22/45 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 66.6% | 57.9% | 46.9% | 47.3% | 52.4% | 53.5% | 39.8% | 2013 | 3/4 | 0.7 | 8.3 | 63.5% | 51.8% | 29.0% | 48.1% | 56.1% | 43.4% | 47.3% |
| 27 | 2007 | 56/67 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 66.4% | 63.7% | 52.1% | 57.0% | 52.8% | 60.1% | 47.2% | 2014 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 58.9% | 55.4% | 39.2% | 40.7% | 25.0% | 48.5% | 32.7% |
| 28 | 2008 | 37/52 | 1.3 | 3.0 | 66.9% | 57.4% | 47.7% | 51.5% | 47.9% | 53.8% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 39/44 | 1.1 | 3.8 | 68.8% | 58.1% | 45.5% | 54.4% | 46.5% | 54.3% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 31/34 | 1.2 | 4.1 | 68.9% | 58.1% | 42.5% | 49.1% | 51.1% | 53.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 12/12 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 64.1% | 53.4% | 42.9% | 45.9% | 45.2% | 49.6% | 41.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 198/273 | 1.1 | 3.2 | 67.2% | 59.2% | 47.3% | 52.4% | 49.8% | 55.3% | 44.4% | — | 64/84 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 64.4% | 57.5% | 40.6% | 46.1% | 46.7% | 51.3% | 40.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Stéphanie Dubois | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1503 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +2.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.16 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1517 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.80 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.24 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1509 | 93.1 | -0.32 | -1.68 | 0.735 | 44.6% | +3 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.32 |
| 20 | 2000 | 1487 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.01 | 2007 | 1513 | 108.4 | -0.50 | -0.09 | 0.952 | 48.7% | +24 | — | — | 43.8% | -0.75 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.19 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1483 | 102.5 | -1.40 | -2.17 | 0.907 | 47.8% | +35 | -30 | — | 34.0% | -1.06 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.76 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1456 | 107.9 | -4.09 | -3.51 | 0.713 | 43.0% | +20 | — | — | 20.8% | -1.71 | 1–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.14 |
| 23 | 2003 | 1474 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.17 | 2010 | 1420 | 96.2 | -2.88 | -2.68 | 0.808 | 45.9% | +37 | — | — | 27.8% | -1.55 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–0 | — | +0.57 |
| 24 | 2004 | 1441 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 20.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.03 | 2011 | 1472 | 108.0 | -2.05 | +0.15 | 0.915 | 47.9% | +19 | — | — | 52.6% | -0.05 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.52 |
| 25 | 2005 | 1492 | 115.8 | -0.71 | -0.20 | 0.911 | 47.7% | +24 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.15 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.5 | +0.20 | 2012 | 1429 | 102.7 | -1.98 | -1.26 | 0.867 | 46.5% | +39 | -12 | +85 | 27.6% | -1.76 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.4 | +0.02 |
| 26 | 2006 | 1568 | 125.9 | -2.07 | -2.76 | 0.856 | 47.0% | -26 | -35 | +78 | 45.1% | -0.47 | 6–10 (38%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.1 | -0.24 | 2013 | 1391 | 96.4 | -3.07 | +0.62 | 0.836 | 45.1% | +36 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.20 |
| 27 | 2007 | 1781 | 148.6 | +3.74 | +2.99 | 1.182 | 53.4% | -39 | -64 | -97 | 63.8% | +1.01 | 6–11 (35%) | 6–7 (46%) | 96.6 | +1.23 | 2014 | 1380 | 99.7 | -0.46 | +0.13 | 0.635 | 41.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.02 |
| 28 | 2008 | 1718 | 130.0 | -1.29 | +1.00 | 0.973 | 49.3% | +25 | -53 | -79 | 51.2% | -0.20 | 10–11 (48%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.6 | +4.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 1672 | 130.3 | -0.57 | +0.29 | 0.966 | 49.1% | +6 | +36 | -62 | 49.5% | -0.11 | 7–6 (54%) | 4–2 (67%) | 102.8 | +0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 1649 | 124.3 | -1.43 | -0.06 | 0.939 | 48.6% | +29 | -16 | -63 | 43.6% | -0.38 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.7 | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 1570 | 105.8 | -3.05 | -1.68 | 0.813 | 45.3% | +74 | +18 | — | 27.6% | -1.59 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.3 | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1846 | 135.5 | +0.06 | +0.67 | 0.994 | 49.8% | +1 | -21 | -54 | 50.0% | -0.07 | 39–51 (43%) | 25–27 (48%) | 97.1 | +1.83 | — | 1569 | 104.5 | -2.09 | -1.69 | 0.841 | 46.2% | +27 | -22 | +85 | 33.2% | -1.26 | 9–23 (28%) | 7–9 (44%) | 93.4 | +2.90 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 9 | 10 | Mar 4, 2011 | H2H |
| Anna Chakvetadze | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 14, 2010 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 19, 2011 | H2H |
| Elena Dementieva | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 2, 2010 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 13, 2010 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marina Erakovic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 3, 2013 | H2H |
| Tsvetana Pironkova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 22, 2012 | H2H |
| Elena Vesnina | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 4, 2012 | H2H |
| Sara Errani | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 23, 2012 | H2H |
| Alexa Glatch | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 17, 2010 | H2H |