H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 3-1

Sybille Bammer holds a 3–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sybille Bammer leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2008 Australian Open first round 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sybille Bammer #20 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #117 Match data
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Sybille Bammer #20 6-4 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #73 Match data
Apr 4, 2007* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Sybille Bammer #29 6-3 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #68 Match data
Oct 14, 2006* Bangkok WTA 500 QF Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #97 6-0 6-2 Sybille Bammer #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,844 130 139 48.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,492 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,569 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,780 0 1 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2008 24–24 50.0% #26 1,682 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,662 0 2 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,646 0 2 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,569 0 2 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4