H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2007 Luxembourg third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2007* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 6-0 6-2 | Tamira Paszek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |