H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 1-0
Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2008 Miami second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2008* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 6-2 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Tathiana Garbin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |