H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sybille Bammer vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 0-1

Virginia Ruano Pascual holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2006 Los Angeles round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruano Pascual
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Virginia Ruano Pascual #73 6-4 6-3 Sybille Bammer #43 Match data Aug 9, 2006* R64 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,818 200 236 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Bammer Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,493 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,476 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1996 9–16 36.0% #87 1,578 0 0
23 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,732 0 1
24 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,776 0 2
25 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,660 0 2
26 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,645 0 2
27 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,634 0 2
29 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,645 0 3
31 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,557 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,629 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,621 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,592 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Bammer Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 16 7 23 69.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 6 6 12 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2000 3 4 7 42.9% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
27 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2002 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2003 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 7 10 17 41.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 10 8 18 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 7 13 46.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — — 78 95 173 45.1% 103 113 216 47.7% 15 18 33 45.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's and 79/176 of Virginia Ruano Pascual's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sybille Bammer Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1% 2003 3/36 0.3 2.3 72.9% 53.4% 41.5% 68.2% 37.0% 50.4% 38.7%
30 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5% 2004 8/28 1.3 3.4 70.2% 57.8% 52.2% 52.1% 47.3% 56.2% 48.0%
31 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0% 2005 3/28 0.3 4.0 62.4% 50.3% 35.5% 47.1% 46.7% 45.6% 48.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/28 0.6 1.5 71.4% 54.8% 47.0% 44.4% 44.7% 52.4% 43.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/25 0.7 2.3 70.3% 56.4% 42.0% 44.3% 49.5% 52.0% 41.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/21 0.4 1.9 71.2% 54.2% 42.7% 44.4% 41.5% 51.2% 43.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 8/8 0.5 2.0 71.2% 53.0% 46.4% 49.2% 50.5% 51.5% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 0.0 3.5 72.4% 48.4% 22.6% 44.9% 66.7% 41.2% 33.3%
Career — 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4% — 79/436 0.6 2.2 70.7% 54.8% 43.9% 46.7% 46.3% 51.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Bammer Virginia Ruano Pascual
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1482 96.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1500 99.8 — — — — — +51 — 44.4% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.24
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1494 108.5 — — — — — +57 — 20.0% -2.30 — — — -0.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1515 112.1 — — — — +6 +45 — 38.9% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.39
20 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 1994 1477 97.0 — — — — — — — 11.1% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.02
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1563 122.2 — — — — -80 +84 — 44.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.72
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1579 126.8 — — — — -49 +24 — 41.5% -0.58 1–6 (14%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.54
23 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17 1997 1733 134.8 — — — — -201 +46 — 59.7% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.26
24 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03 1998 1776 128.0 — — — — -190 +21 -133 52.5% +0.08 8–2 (80%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.47
25 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.20 1999 1660 125.0 — — — — +3 -16 — 46.0% -0.25 4–5 (44%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07
26 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.24 2000 1645 110.8 — — — — -9 +3 — 50.0% -0.22 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — +0.51
27 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.23 2001 1607 125.9 — — — — +10 -10 — 45.8% -0.06 3–7 (30%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.34
28 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) — +4.02 2002 1634 125.4 — — — — -64 +48 — 51.6% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.57
29 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.49 2003 1695 119.9 -0.97 -0.92 0.780 45.2% +1 -67 — 51.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.46
30 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.29 2004 1646 113.0 +0.06 +0.93 1.096 52.2% -62 +26 -34 46.0% -0.48 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60
31 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.29 2005 1558 111.3 -2.34 +0.61 0.895 47.0% -10 +41 +17 43.7% -0.70 4–11 (27%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1660 123.5 -1.95 +0.13 0.913 47.7% -22 -29 -79 53.3% -0.22 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1630 114.4 -2.70 -1.70 0.870 47.0% +1 -49 0 47.3% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.25
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1622 110.7 -3.08 -0.59 0.894 47.2% -6 -63 +17 41.7% -0.65 4–2 (67%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.37
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1621 116.1 -1.29 -1.20 0.849 46.4% -17 -30 — 35.3% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.67
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 94.6 -3.08 -1.43 0.568 37.4% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
Career — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83 — 1819 126.4 -2.15 -0.62 0.891 47.4% -34 +18 -37 47.2% -0.29 56–75 (43%) 46–39 (54%) 97.4 +0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.