H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sybille Bammer vs Zuzana Ondraskova H2H: 1-0
Sybille Bammer holds a 1–0 lead over Zuzana Ondraskova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Bammer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Bammer won the 2010 US Open first round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 46
Left-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sybille Bammer | 7-5 6-0 | Zuzana Ondraskova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Bammer | #161 | #19 | 2,014 | 1,844 | 130 | 139 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Zuzana Ondraskova | #1,140 | #74 | 811 | 1,595 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sybille Bammer | Zuzana Ondraskova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #294 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #129 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #88 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #49 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #108 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #19 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #54 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #83 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #161 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #438 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |