H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

Sybille Niox Chateau vs Denisa Szabova H2H: 0-1

Denisa Szabova holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Niox Chateau in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Szabova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denisa Szabova won the 1988 Hamburg round of 64 7-6 1-6 6-4.

H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denisa Szabova 7-6 1-6 6-4 Sybille Niox Chateau Match data Jul 27, 1988* R64 Hamburg WTA 250 Clay

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sybille Niox Chateau 1,530 16 35 31.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denisa Szabova 1,577 18 37 32.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Denisa Szabova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1987 2–2 50.0% 1,505 0 0
18 1988 5–10 33.3% 1,492 0 0
19 1989 0–4 0.0% 1,463 0 0 1988 5–6 45.5% 1,543 0 0
20 1990 0–2 0.0% 1,451 0 0 1989 0–4 0.0% 1,499 0 0
21 1991 4–5 44.4% 1,487 0 0 1990 1–4 20.0% 1,495 0 0
22 1992 5–11 31.2% 1,456 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% 1,516 0 0
23 1992 3–11 21.4% 1,461 0 0
24 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,453 0 0
26 1995 3–2 60.0% 1,486 0 0
27 1996 2–3 40.0% 1,495 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Denisa Szabova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1987 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
20 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 0 4 4 0.0%
21 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
24 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1996 2 3 5 40.0%
Career 2 7 9 22.2% 14 26 40 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 16 26 42 38.1% 1 4 5 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Denisa Szabova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
16 1986 1485 99.7 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.20
17 1987 1506 101.0 +31 44.4% -0.89 1–0 +0.38
18 1988 1493 111.7 +25 +37 42.9% -0.37 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.90
19 1989 1463 104.7 +49 11.1% -3.11 0–1 1–0 -0.19 1988 1543 111.9 +41 44.0% -0.68 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) -0.25
20 1990 1451 98.8 20.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.21 1989 1499 95.5 +35 11.1% -3.55 0–1 +0.02
21 1991 1488 107.4 +20 44.4% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.65 1990 1496 105.7 +30 25.0% -2.09 1–1 1–0 -0.29
22 1992 1456 101.8 +21 +40 36.1% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) +1.68 1991 1517 113.6 -34 +51 47.8% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +0.52
23 1992 1462 86.4 -5 +42 22.6% -2.39 2–1 (67%) 0–1 +0.87
24 1993 1454 99.0 33.3% -2.00 0–1 -0.07
26 1995 1487 107.3 +63 53.8% -0.15 2–1 (67%) +0.65
27 1996 1495 101.7 +52 36.4% -1.64 1–0 1–1 +0.10
Career 1531 107.7 +23 +35 37.4% -0.99 2–13 (13%) 6–4 (60%) +6.69 1577 104.6 -1 +47 35.4% -1.43 8–9 (47%) 5–5 (50%) +2.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.