H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Sybille Niox Chateau holds a 1–0 lead over Immaculada Varas Caro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Niox Chateau leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sybille Niox Chateau won the 1991 Barcelona round of 64 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Niox Chateau | 6-2 6-3 | Immaculada Varas Caro | Match data | Apr 24, 1991* | R64 | Barcelona | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Niox Chateau | — | — | — | 1,530 | 16 | 35 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Immaculada Varas Caro | — | — | — | 1,509 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sybille Niox Chateau | Immaculada Varas Caro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Sybille Niox Chateau | Immaculada Varas Caro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 14 | 26 | 40 | 35.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | Career | — | — | — | — | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Sybille Niox Chateau | Immaculada Varas Caro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1485 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.20 | 1986 | 1485 | 93.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1987 | 1506 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 44.4% | -0.89 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.40 | 1988 | 1488 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | 36.4% | -1.73 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.45 |
| 1988 | 1492 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +26 | +38 | — | 42.9% | -0.37 | 0–5 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.44 | 1989 | 1462 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | 14.3% | -2.14 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 |
| 1989 | 1463 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | 11.1% | -3.11 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | 1990 | 1482 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 |
| 1990 | 1451 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.29 | 1991 | 1465 | 95.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 1991 | 1487 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | 44.4% | -0.50 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1456 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +21 | +40 | — | 36.1% | -1.19 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.3 | +1.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1531 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | +24 | +35 | — | 37.4% | -0.99 | 2–13 (13%) | 6–4 (60%) | 91.3 | +4.18 | Career | 1510 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 26.9% | -2.12 | 1–1 | — | — | +3.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 25, 1991 | H2H |
| Isabel Cueto | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 27, 1989 | H2H |
| Catherine Mothes Jobkel | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 9, 1992 | H2H |
| Tammy Whittington | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 24, 1992 | H2H |
| Beverly Bowes | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 27, 1992 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybille Niox Chateau | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 27, 1990 | H2H |
| Cecilia Dahlman | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 26, 1990 | H2H |
| Anne Minter | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 31, 1989 | H2H |
| Katharina Duell | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 3, 1989 | H2H |