H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sybille Niox Chateau vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-2

Isabel Cueto holds a 2–0 lead over Sybille Niox Chateau in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1989 Bastad round of 32 6-4 6-2.

H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto #37 6-4 6-2 Sybille Niox Chateau Match data Jul 27, 1989* R32 Bastad WTA 250 Clay
Isabel Cueto #68 6-1 6-0 Sybille Niox Chateau Match data Jul 10, 1987* R16 Knokke WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Niox Chateau 1,530 16 35 31.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1987 2–2 50.0% 1,505 0 0 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1988 5–10 33.3% 1,492 0 0 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0
19 1989 0–4 0.0% 1,463 0 0 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2
20 1990 0–2 0.0% 1,451 0 0 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4
21 1991 4–5 44.4% 1,487 0 0 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1992 5–11 31.2% 1,455 0 0 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Isabel Cueto
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6%
21 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0%
23 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 2 7 9 22.2% 14 26 40 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Isabel Cueto
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1984 1509 106.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.12
16 1986 1485 99.7 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.20 1985 1521 110.4 +17 +59 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1987 1506 101.0 +29 44.4% -0.89 1–0 +0.40 1986 1539 121.5 -48 +97 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1988 1492 111.7 +26 +38 42.9% -0.37 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.44 1987 1761 135.7 -187 +64 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28
19 1989 1463 104.7 +49 11.1% -3.11 0–1 1–0 -0.19 1988 1826 141.4 -254 +103 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40
20 1990 1451 98.8 20.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.29 1989 1817 132.8 +87 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58
21 1991 1487 107.4 +21 44.4% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.31 1990 1799 139.4 -220 +80 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94
22 1992 1456 101.8 +21 +40 36.1% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.3 +1.26 1991 1662 120.0 -82 +47 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03
23 1992 1591 97.8 -65 0.0% -3.67 -0.24
Career 1531 107.6 +24 +35 37.4% -0.99 2–13 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 91.3 +4.18 1885 137.0 -131 +81 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.