H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sybille Niox Chateau vs Joanne Limmer H2H: 1-0

Sybille Niox Chateau holds a 1–0 lead over Joanne Limmer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sybille Niox Chateau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sybille Niox Chateau won the 1992 Brisbane International round of 64 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sybille Niox Chateau
FRA Age 56
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Joanne Limmer
AUS Age 52 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sybille Niox Chateau 6-3 6-3 Joanne Limmer #290 Match data Jan 1, 1992* R64 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Niox Chateau — — — 1,530 16 35 31.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Joanne Limmer #744 #141 25 1,520 3 8 27.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Joanne Limmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1987 2–2 50.0% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1988 5–10 33.3% — 1,492 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #162 1,495 0 0
19 1989 0–4 0.0% — 1,463 0 0 1993 1–4 20.0% #211 1,465 0 0
20 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,451 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #288 1,470 0 0
21 1991 4–5 44.4% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1992 5–11 31.2% — 1,455 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Joanne Limmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2 7 9 22.2% 14 26 40 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Joanne Limmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1485 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1987 1506 101.0 — — — — — +29 — 44.4% -0.89 1–0 — — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1988 1492 111.7 — — — — +26 +38 — 42.9% -0.37 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.44 1992 1495 100.2 — — — — +31 — — 42.9% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.41
19 1989 1463 104.7 — — — — — +49 — 11.1% -3.11 0–1 1–0 — -0.19 1993 1466 100.0 — — — — +24 — — 25.0% -1.83 1–1 2–0 — +0.20
20 1990 1451 98.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.29 1994 1470 106.0 — — — — +26 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — -0.07
21 1991 1487 107.4 — — — — — +21 — 44.4% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1992 1456 101.8 — — — — +21 +40 — 36.1% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.3 +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1531 107.6 — — — — +24 +35 — 37.4% -0.99 2–13 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 91.3 +4.18 — 1521 102.6 — — — — +26 — — 32.0% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +4.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.